After many,
many people started creaming their pants about the television series, I saw
this book on the counter at GameStation and thought, ‘Why not? Let’s see what
all the fuss is about.’ So I took it. In exchange for money.
I’m ashamed
that it is one of the only books I own that has the television cover on it,
which is also annoying because all the rest of the books I’ve bought in the
series do not having matching covers which is something I will struggle to live
with.
While the TV
series was enjoyable, the books are so much better. In terms of character
building and story telling the narrative is well developed and the dialogue
tells you so much about the type of person the character is.
I didn’t
make any notes over the first 375 pages which shows how cleanly written it is,
however after this point, it suffers from Stephen King’s Carrie syndrome as the writing completely falls apart. It was like
the first 300 pages were submitted for publication and then the rest of it was
just rush written with little editing.
For example
at the bottom of page 376 there is a piece of dialogue that I still cannot
understand; ‘Mind you, Princess, if the lords of the Seven Kingdoms, have the with
the gods gave a goose...’ Can someone please tell me what this is supposed to
mean? It’s clearly a typing error of some sort but it makes the dialogue
meaningless which is unfortunate at best.
There are
loads of other little ones that don’t have that much of an impact; an
additional ‘e’ on ‘gather’ or ‘withing’ instead of ‘within,’ and a few
additional punctuation errors but nothing too major.
One did make
me laugh though. On page 451, one of the more casually written pages, George is
writing about a character called Karyl, yet the spelling in the book of this
character changes to ‘Kary!’ I’m not a hundred percent sure how this happened.
The book was written in 1996 so I can only assume the author was using the
standard keypad, but the ‘L’ key and the ‘!’ key are fifteen centimetres apart
on my laptop keyboard so that’s quite the jump to make.
On page 481
we have the case of the overused description. In this instance, I will assume
that most people have seen the series however, one of the characters is killed
after he is mean to his sister and the narrative describes him as ‘the man who
had been her brother’ far too often, thus it loses its impact.
There were a
few instances of out of place narrative as well, one of the most funny being on
page 718 where Sansa is confronted by Joffrey, has an emotional breakdown, and
then describes his clothing – just like any normal person would do. The book is
780 pages long. I don’t think we need to know what the boy king is wearing in
the middle of an intense scene. It would be fine has this been written from an
omniscient narrator but we are effectively in Sansa’s head after she is talking
about her father being killed. I don’t think she would stop to assess Joffrey’s current fashion trend.
One more
thing that I found puzzling more than annoying was trying to understand how the
Night’s Watch works. John Snow joins the Night’s Watch by choice. Most people
are taken there because they are given the choice of the Night’s Watch or
death. Now, if you choose to join, does that mean you are allowed to keep your
pet wolf? I wouldn’t have expected the Night’s Watch to be the kind to allow
pets. Certainly no other recruits have this luxury so why is John Snow allowed
to keep his direwolf with him at all times? It isn’t even restricted to kennels
- it sleeps with him in his room! It doesn’t make a lot of sense to me but I’m
sure it’s okay because it’s necessary to drive the story. In case you can’t
tell the previous sentence is sarcastic.
I would
recommend reading A Game of Thrones even
if you have watched the series. I’ve heard the argument previously of ‘there’s
no point reading what you can watch on TV.’ But this statement is bollocks at
the best times and even more so in relation to these books.
A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin
was published by Voyager in 1996. RRP £8.99 (Paperback)
The version I wish I owned |
No comments:
Post a Comment